Thursday, December 26, 2013

Monday, December 16, 2013

We Are the Dog with Two Lost Eyes

We are the Dog with Two Lost Eyes
Where necklaces are burning tires
Strung to a Village End.

We are the Dog with Two Lost Eyes
A Crumpled Bicycle, shoeless feet,
The old man's head split like a coconut,
Offering to the street gods,
Clumped and bloodied.

Pan the temple elephant
From a Three-wheeler speeding by
Morning light shines through the animal's bath
Blessing the temple,
Say a prayer for us all.

An explosion of pain
births spirit wrapped
in blood and feces
fluids the smell
of the swamps of first life
Primordial.

Full of hope and trouble.



-
By Emilie Parry,  2003



**When my nephew Aaron was 4 years old, he described an old blind dog he saw as "the dog with two lost eyes."

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Press Briefing of CIDSE/WCC/LWF and INEB/ICE Network (International Network of Engaged Buddhists/Inter-Religious Climate and Ecology Network)

       VIDEO LINK to PRESS CONFERENCE ** VIDEO LINK TO PRESS CONFERENCE


Warsaw Climate Change Conference - November 2013

Press Briefing

Warsaw, Poland

22 November 2013

CIDSE and Lutheran World Federation:
Global Call for Fasting for Climate


In the press conference, I was honored to be asked to speak on behalf of INEB (the International Network of Engaged Buddhists) and ICE Network (Inter-Religious Network for Climate and Ecology) at the UNFCCC. COP 19 Warsaw.

Spirit and Climate: Change asks us to define ourselves through action, through intentions

Between Spirituality and Climate Change
By Emilie C. Parry

I believe that Climate Change is pressing upon us some great existential questions.  We are in the midst of great upheaval, multiple and mass species extinctions, rising sea levels swallowing countries whole, large swaths of formerly inhabitable land left abandoned to the sun, tumultuous and unpredictable weather patterns tossing us in its throws with intensity and frequency beyond previously known scopes. People are dying, displaced and shattered, because climate change is impacting us now.  

I don’t believe this is a doomsday scenario, I don’t believe the Gods and Goddesses must be angry and are reigning down their punishment upon us. I do know that we humans have had a hand in making our planet sick, tossing it out of balance. We have not lived in balance with the Earth and now the Earth is rapidly changing because of us.   Already this change is affecting us, and the science of probabilities and cause and effect tell us it is going to get worse before it gets better. We will be changed with the earth.  So the existential questions asks us, “Who are we as humans on this planet? Who do we wish to be?  What values do we wish to carry with us to shape and form our experiences as we walk through this change together?” Loss, death, sweeping change is inevitable.   How we guide this process and who we become through it, that is up to us.

Without spirit, without meaning, why would it matter if humanity and many species who share this planet us die out?  To most of the world’s people, it does matter. We do matter.  This life matters, as do all beings within it.  This is the realm of spirituality, of religion, of faith and meaning. Across the world’s religions large and small, from Buddhism to Christianity, Judaism to Hinduism, Islam and the many Shamanic and animist peoples around the globe, we share scriptures, we share teachings and we share a search for meaning.  We collectively share faith-based and spiritual values that honor our living planet and all beings upon.  Commitment is renewed to protect and care for our planet, and nature is symbolized across faith scripture, the Buddhavacana, the Torah, the Koran, Shamanic oral storytelling, the Vedas and Upanishads: from the Tree of Life to the Bodhi tree, cleansing waters, Jubilee, the dove with the olive branch, the rhythms of the sun rising and setting, the first rains and the bounties of harvest.   We as humanity honor our natural world, and we are committed to care and protect it as we are a part of it and it is a part of us.   Similarly, the basis of compassion, a sense of social justice (liberation theology), and a span of faith practices, ask us to care for and protect each other.  As many populations grow increasingly vulnerable to the impacts of changing and extreme climates, the onus is upon us to act to protect others from harm, and to walk together through suffering with our fellow living beings.  As faith leaders and spiritual practitioners, we must engage in education and outreach to our communities around climate change, we must commit to activities to mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and climate change adaptation. This responsibility is rooted in who we are and who we claim we wish to be in the world. We cannot do other than engage.


“Asssuredly the creation of the heavens and the earth is greater than the creation of humankind: Yet most people understand not.” –Holy Qur’an 40:57

“As we live in the forest, we are respectful of the environment. When we farm, we don’t disturb the trees.  We maintain the watersheds around springs. When we hunt, we never kill females.  When we need timber, we cut the branch, not the tree.  We are rooted in these values, and we instill them in our children. We live with the environment, not in competition with it.”  -- Veddha chief Uruwarige Wannila Aththo (Sri Lanka)

Buddhism: In the Agamas Sutras, the Buddha said that the planting of trees create shade for others and merit for oneself.  In Section Five of the Vinyay-matkra-satra, it reads, “A bhiksu who plants three kinds of trees in honor of the Triple Gem – a fruit, a flowering tree, and a leafy tree—cultivates blessings and is not committing wrong.”  Planting trees not only beautifies the environment, it is also a form of practice. Throughout history, Buddhist temples and monasteries have followed the Buddha’s teachings by planting trees, growing flowers and caring for the great earth.


Participants work on a Buddhist Mandala during the INEB, or International Network of Engaged Buddhists, 2012 conference: Inter-Religious Dialogue to Address the  Human Drivers of Climate Change, and Biodiversity Conservation

Climate Change: Forcing a Re-frame on "Development" and "Emergencies"

These notes below come from a conversation with a new friend I met at the COP 19 in Warsaw. I thought it might be interesting to share more widely:

Re-thinking Development and Emergencies in the Context of Climate Change: 
A New Era for Community-Centered Resilience

By Emilie Parry

The challenges we are facing with climate change are forcing us, as a global humanitarian community, to shift away from externally applied “silo” thinking which segregates approaches of development from disaster response, a disaster recovery “phase,” and a rehabilitation “phase,” rolling in again to another cycle of development until the next emergency arises.  This current strategy does not view the experiences through the lens of most climate-vulnerable communities with whom/for whom these separated “specialists” purport to work, a lens that necessitates a long view, with tools and capacities people must possess to not only survive, but continue to work towards their own dreams, hopes, and needs in the present and for their futures. 

Climate resilience must rest within the resources, knowledge and toolkits at the (most vulnerable) community and local civil society level.  People at the “front line” of climate change impacts, and their living environments, must take center stage.

It is our job as international humanitarians to identify spaces for exchanged learning, support and co-facilitated planning and trainings of local civil society and climate-vulnerable communities.  We are tasked to support and facilitate local “know-how” and access to the panoply of resources which climate-vulnerable folks must be able to navigate and utilize in order to cope with all that has and will come their way.

If people are to be agents of their own destinies, and if as a planet we truly hold up and wish to perpetuate our values of human and environment rights, equity, dignity and respect, then we must evolve in our attitudes, our systems and our collective approach to our broadening experiences with climate change. 


In my experiences working in development and humanitarian response and recovery NGOs, it became clear to me that we were moving into a perpetual crisis mode, forced to react constantly, without much time allowed for thinking, processing, planning or collaborating with those people who knew the most about their own environment and the capabilities, socio-political and economic dynamics, and opportunities. It felt deeply wrong to me, and I have been striving for truly sustainable strategies and relationships within these reactionary times.  We in the humanitarian response community know that that there is much that is not working in the way we operate. We also know that as climate change impact increases, so will be amplified these gaps and failings in our systems and strategies.  It is time to step out of the structures we inherited from the original extractive and hierarchical masters. We must step away and walk towards new relationships and new ways of listening and problem-solving together with each other.  To form new systems and ways of working,  we must genuinely approach this challenge and opportunity with true respect, sitting down together with those people we call our partners, and become true collaborators for resilience and the creation of many and varied new paths.


                        Ban Ki Moon at the Warsaw 2013 COP 19 which I attended this November.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Of Suffering, Childbirth and NGOs: Death of No-longer-Useful Mentalities and Structures allows Birth of New Approaches and Attitudes (Doulas of the Humanitarian Field!)


This is an old blog I wrote in 2009, and just realized I never published:

To Alleviate Suffering

For all of us in this life, there will be moments of intense suffering. We know this is inevitable.  We know we will all experience loss, heartbreak and decay, we will all have to know change and we will all be asked to transform ourselves, again and again. The question then is not whether or not people will suffer, it is how they will experience their suffering, how they will walk through it and what transformations will follow.

I’ve recently been asking friends, “What does your suffering teach you about joy, compassion, love?"  Their responses have moved me, and have also shown me an aspect of who they are at this moment, what lessons they are learning for this phase of their lives. (I admit I've found myself learning many lessons over and over again, approaching the lesson from a different angle or perspective each time until I finally get it.) For some  in answering this question, there is a beautiful lightness and joy in their words, reliving the memory of a personal revelation: “Personally, a lot! In my worst experiences of suffering, I found reserves of love and especially compassion that I never would have imagined otherwise. The trick is putting those lessons to work." For others suffering is still associated deeply with anger, rage, loss, pain, a sense of injustice and strife.   "How could you link 'joy, compassion, love' with suffering?" they want to know.

I've been asking this question about suffering because I am interested in people's perspectives on the role suffering plays in our lives, people from all cultures and countries and experiences.  How people respond to this question may bely where each person is in her or his own cycle of suffering/loss/grief/recovery and healing, and how each person takes the lessons life has given us.  Raising the question of suffering can draw out a person's current relationship with suffering itself. One friend  has a lot of anger, and interprets "right and wrong," "good and bad" rather rigidly,  viewing the world in absolutes.  Life has offered him struggles existing very much now in the muddled grey areas, he finds himself in a fog, confused and still angry. Perhaps he needs to sit in the fog for while, perhaps the lesson he is trying to work through is offering an opportunity to accept and be comfortable with the blurred complexities, with the unclear and unknown. Another friend, brilliant, intensely pensive and introspective, has been coming to terms in recent years with addiction and how he has coped with his own losses and blocked new joy and happiness from entering his life. His current relationship to suffering has been about letting old suffering die, letting it go so that new life and new feelings may enter. "It is better to feel pain than nothing at all" was his old mantra. He has to be brave about letting go of the pain, not knowing what emotions may fill this newly evacuated space.


I'm thinking a lot about the idea of suffering and my work, and the approach of people in the NGO/humanitarian field at large, as well as the individual experiences of suffering or encountering suffering [...or attempting to address/struggle against/fight suffering with the flat, structured "hardware" of material life]. Our most transformative moments may come when we stop struggling against suffering and embrace it, experience the pain fully and release it. Our most transformative moments in community may be when we walk through suffering together and come out the other side.

I've been writing this book, my working title "The Reluctant Aid Worker: Striving for Sustainability in Reactionary Times." For a while I've been focusing on what sustainability is, how listening is essential for sustainability and transformation, and how this could (but does not currently) translate into the current systems we have for working towards sustainable development and disaster risk management and sustainable recoveries. If I am not careful,  I can catch myself deeply mired in the layers of structure and mis-functions , the rhetoric and games of my field. To invite clarity,  I'm stepping back and looking inward, returning to some key human experiences: struggle, suffering, joy, compassion, learning, love.  I want to deconstruct my work in the NGO realm: I want to break it all down to build it back up again in a way that makes sense as much to my heart, my spirit, as it does to my mind.
--------
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

In childbirth, hospital interventions often result in complications and increase child and mother mortality. Can we trust the ability of the human body to do what it has been meant to do for the ages? Can we trust that the processes of nature may know more than we?
How are NGO and IGO interventions like these westernized hospital interventions?  Should we approach our work as institutions more like a doula, or midwife approaches her work? The first premise of a doula is that the mother and the mother’s body knows best, and knows more than the doula. She serves as a guide, shares her knowledge and experiences of the birthing process, connects the mother to resources and ensures her safety and well-being. She walks through the birthing process with the mother, but does not do it for her, and does not tell her that she knows better than the mother’s body does. She is a partner, a guide, a transporter of the knowledge of generations, a resource and support.
Much like the western medical interventions and institutions (which treat pregnancy as a disease), our non-governmental, development  and disaster funding institutions were modeled and solidified during an era which rejected the knowledge of the ages, which sought to overtake and control the natural systems rather than to work through them, and were established for profit-based and structure/materially-based motives and values.

I’ve worked for a many NGOs (non-governmental organizations) around the world whose “motto” or “mission” includes the phrase, “our goal is to alleviate suffering.”  These missions/mottos sound credible, altruistic, just and righteous…but  what does this mean in "real terms?" And should that be our end goal? Can that be our end goal?  Suffering is inevitable for all of us, to greater and lesser extents, and within suffering rests perhaps the greatest gift for humanity.

A woman giving birth naturally with a midwife reaches a height of pain that transforms into ecstasy, an interlocking of pleasure and pain simultaneously, followed by, with the birth, enormous joy, and a realization of one’s own potential, strength and capacity.
To walk into pain and experience it fully, rather than fighting it, what gift exists there? What strength, power, and self-agency can be discovered when we together walk through suffering and pain, and come out on the other side with dignity and respect?

Why is it that when I am amidst great suffering, I often am filled with the greatest sense of hope?


Los Angeles


                                                             Los Angeles
This city. Leaving this city.  I feel everything and nothing at all.  I am sad, I am not sad.  I am not grieving a home.  I walk the cracked and urine-splatted concrete of Sunset, an orange globe sinking fat and swollen over the warm greens and yellows of stucco box buildings.  I think, "This is California."  This is California wherever there is California, it is just louder here, the colors warmer from the sun, the browns of the earth and dust thickening the air.  A jumble of houses crowding the hills, fighting space and light with the fierce, determined trees and shrubs, the true green of a neon city.  Smells reminiscent of Port-au-Prince slums, sights calling up corners of Mexico, hillsides of Brazil, ghosts of Central America.  This is California.  I am sad, I am not sad.  I am grieving a love.  I am grieving the ache in my womb, the yearning of my throat, the loss the speed the loss the struggle to gain to hold to grab all as you feel it slipping away, gone.  I never held it.  Never knew this life. 
This city.



                                                                                               Dec. 2004, Emilie Parry